阿德莱德代写essay:交流/反渗透

2017-05-27 00:35

同化（交流/反渗透）是库伯的第二种模式，这意味着“看和思考”这种人需要理论，而不是实际。他们想要更多的解释，而不是实际的机会。思想和观念比人们更重要的是用逻辑的方法解决问题。第三种风格的融合（AC / AE）是指'做和想'这些类型的学习者不需要任何理论，但他们想实际。他们可以通过实际问题解决他们的问题，他们更喜欢技术任务和更少的人际关系和人际关系方面，和融合风格的人喜欢尝试新的想法来模拟和工作与实际应用。第四种风格是容纳（CE / AE）的意思是'做和感觉'这是人们使用其他人的分析，信息或可以是他们的产品，并愿意采取实际的，经验的方法，他们使用别人的信息，并进行自己的分析。他们被吸引到新的挑战和经验，并执行计划。有了这种学习风格的人愿意在团队中完成目标，他们设定了目标，并积极地在不同的领域尝试不同的方式来达到一个客观的目标.当比较蜂蜜和芒福德模型和库伯的模型有区分不同的学习风格。蜂蜜和芒福德描述了同样的事情由库伯的，但使用不同的话，所以这两个模型之间没有这样的区别。因此，在库伯的模型第一阶段很相似说具体经验（有经验）说，充分参与到一个行动或互动，利用现有的知识和技能，但在蜂蜜和芒福德模式的描述是描述活动的直接经验，豁达，无聊与实施。库伯的第二个阶段观察反思（总结经验）说，回头看发生了什么事，描述它，思考和学习行为的影响的原因，但是蜂蜜和芒福德的反射式是说先听后说、思考和分析，得出结论，延迟。库伯模型的第三阶段是抽象概念（从经验）是形成泛化、概念和理论，将使整合的观察与思考为未来的场合或在其他情况下的行为，但是蜂蜜和芒福德的理论家的风格像人认为通过逻辑方面。在库伯模型的第四阶段是积极试验（下一步的规划）是描述学习者在规划方面可以应用和测试在进一步行动，但蜂蜜和芒福德的实用主义风格，寻求尝试新的想法，实际的结论，脚踏实地，享受解决问题和决策。同时积极和包容，反射和发散，理论家和同化，实用主义和收敛是相似的概念。
阿德莱德代写essay:交流/反渗透
Assimilating (AC/RO) is the second style of Kolb's model, this mean 'watching and thinking' this kind of people need theory rather than the practical. They want more an explanation than the practical opportunity. Ideas and concepts are more important than people also use the logical approach when solve the problems. The third style is converging (AC/AE) is mean 'doing and thinking' these type of learners does not need any theories, but they want practical. They can solve their problems through practical issues; they prefer technical task and less relationship with people and interpersonal aspects, and people with a converging style like to experiment with new ideas to simulate and to work with practical applications. The fourth style is accommodating (CE/AE) means 'doing and feeling' this is where the people use other people's analysis, information or can be their product and prefer to take a practical, experiential approach, they use others information and carry out their own analysis. They are attracted to new challenges and experiences and to carrying out plans. People with this learning style willing to work in teams to complete the goal and they set the targets and actively work in the field trying different ways to achieve an objective.When comparing Honey and Mumford model and the Kolb's model there are distinguish between different learning styles. Honey and Mumford described the same thing done by Kolb's but using different words, so therefore there is no such difference between these two models. Hence there is a strong similarity in Kolb's model stage one says concrete experience (Having and experience) says being fully involved in an action or interaction, utilizing current knowledge and skills but in Honey and Mumford model style one describe Activists which is describing immediate experience, open-minded, bored with implementation. Kolb's second stage Reflective observation (reviewing the experience) is say looking back at what happened, describing it, reflecting on the causes and effects of learner behaviour, but Honey and Mumford's reflectors style is say listen before speaking, ponder and analyse, delay reaching conclusions. The third stage of Kolb's model is Abstract Conceptualization (concluding from the experience) is forming generalization, concepts and theories that will enable to integrate observation and reflections into behaviour on future occasions or in other contexts, but Honey and Mumford's theorist style like people think through logical aspect. The fourth stage in Kolb's model is Active Experimentation (Planning the next steps) is describe planning ways in which in learner can apply and test conclusion in further action but Honey and Mumford's Pragmatists style which is seek try and new ideas, practical, down to earth, enjoying problem solving and decision making. Also activist and accommodating, reflector and diverging, theorist and assimilating, pragmatist and converging are similar to each concept.

• 上一篇：阿德莱德essay代写:慢学习者
• 下一篇：阿德莱德代写assignment:一项旁观者运动