ASSIGNMENT代写

阿德莱德Adelaide代写:年龄范围

2020-01-16 19:09

为了验证这一假设,Dfaz-Caneja等人(2018)选择了6- 17岁的孩子的年龄范围来参与这项研究。虽然使用这个年龄范围可能是一个优势,因为后代更发达,但也有一个限制。Levine和Munsch(2016)解释了过去的研究如何表明,随着时间的推移,儿童有保持相同性情的倾向。考虑到这一点,也有人认为,小的变化可能会发生在发展过程中,导致一些变化,在一个人的气质。有一种观点认为,随着时间的推移,脆弱性的某些方面会发生变化,即个体在幼儿时期可能会表现出更多的外化特征(munsch&levine, 2016)。考虑到这些争论,建议使用更大的年龄范围进行抽样,这将有助于确定这两种疾病的特定气质维度是否从出生时就存在。本研究采用混合方法设计。首先看一下主要的定性技术,它可能暗含结果,如直接观察。根据Coolican(2014)的研究,使用直接/自然观察法有优势和局限性。虽然Dfaz-Caneja等人(2018)可能使用这种方法在自然环境中检查每个后代,以获得对个体在非受控环境中如何行为的更准确的洞察。但是,在考虑通过承认被观察而放大某些行为的可能性时,这可能是一种限制。Coolican(2014)在过去的研究中阐述了这种局限性的出现。考虑到实验条件的这种争论,这可能涉及到数据的小方面,因为某些性情特征在观察中被表达出来,比如增加的多动症或明显的焦虑/害羞。
阿德莱德Adelaide代写:年龄范围
In order to test this hypothesis, Dfaz-Caneja et al., (2018) chose an age range for the offspring of 6- 17-year olds to take part within this study. Although using this age range may be an advantage as the offspring are more developed, there is also a limitation which lies with this. Levine and Munsch (2016) explained how past research states overtime, children have the tendency to maintain the same temperament. With that in mind, it is also argued that small changes may occur through development, causing some changes within an individual’s temperament. There is a suggestion of certain aspects of vulnerability changing overtime, the notion that individuals may exhibit more externalising traits within early childhood, (Munsch& Levine, 2016). Considering these arguments, a suggestion of using a wider age range for sampling, would help to determine whether specific temperament dimensions of both disorders, are present from birth.This study was designed using a mixed method approach. Looking firstly at the main qualitative technique which may implicate results, such as direct observations. According to Coolican (2014) there are strengths and limitations of the use of direct/ naturalistic observations. Although Dfaz-Caneja et al., (2018) may have used this approach to examine each offspring in a naturalistic setting, to gain a more accurate insight to how that individual acts within a non-controlled environment. However, this may be a limitation when considering the possibility of certain behaviour being amplified, through the acknowledgement of being observed. Coolican (2014) states the occurrence of such limitations within past studies. Given this argument for the experimental conditions, this may have implicated small aspects of the data, due to certain temperament traits being expressed within observation, such as increased hyperactivity or visible augmented anxiety/shyness.