ASSIGNMENT代写

纽卡斯尔代写Essay:改变世界的关系

2018-10-07 11:47

人类是主观的,因为尽管他们试图停止影响自己所在的世界,但他们正在改变世界。这种通过行动改变世界的关系,把任何客观的观点变成主观的观点,因为它们正在影响纯观察者所不能影响的东西。通过试图简单地停止“做”而仅仅观察,人们试图达到一种纯粹客观的状态。然而,一旦人们认为它们的存在本身就是一种“行为”,这就变成了一项不可能完成的任务。也就是说,要想达到真正的目标,唯一的办法就是暂时停止存在,只在不存在的状态下观察,然后作为一个人重新在这个世界上存在。能够考虑完成这些不可能的任务,就像做上帝一样。总的来说,一个人不可能达到一种不存在的状态,因为仅仅是活着的行为就会使人变得主观,因为他们对周围的世界有影响。当人类还年轻的时候,当他们意识到他们的存在被排他性所包围时,他们最终会到达一个点。他们看到自己的生活充满了选择,道路上的分叉使人明显地看到,无论什么时候选择一样东西,都必须排除其他东西。这些选择可能会带来在选择和各自后果之间进行权衡的痛苦,同时也会让人产生这样的想法:一个人不可能拥有一切。考虑到人类为了获得另一事物而不得不排除一件事物的局限性,人们总是会在他们的选择中达到一定的客观性;他们想要通过从情感上脱离他们不得不做出的选择,来消除一些痛苦和困难。尽管存在的真理存在于主观性之中,但这里却有一个悖论;尽管“答案”在另一个方向上存在:超越主观性,但人类几乎已经预先设定了达到客观性的目标。
纽卡斯尔代写Essay:改变世界的关系
Humans are subjective because despite trying to stop affecting world that they are a part of, they are changing it. This relationship, which causes a change in the world through action, changes any objective view into a subjective one because they are influencing what a pure observer cannot. By trying to simply stop ‘doing’ and merely observe, people attempt to reach a state of pure objectivity. This, however, becomes an impossible task once one considers that their mere existence is an ‘act’ in and of itself. Meaning that the only way to become truly objective is to temporarily stop existing, observe purely in that non-existent state, and then resume existing within the world as a human being. To be able to even consider performing these impossible tasks is akin to being God. In total, it is impossible for a human being to achieve a state of non existence simply because the mere act of living causes one to become subjective due to the fact they have an influence on the world around them.While they are young, humans eventually reach a point when they become aware that their existences are enveloped in exclusivity. They see that their lives are filled with choices, forks in the road which make it apparent that whenever one chooses something, something else must be excluded. These choices can bring the pain of having to weigh between the options and the respective consequences, as well as coming to terms with the idea that one cannot have everything. Considering the human limitation of having to exclude one thing in order to gain another, people will always reach for a level of objectivity in their choices; they want to remove some of the pain and difficulty that they feel from having to make those choices by detaching themselves emotionally from the choices they have to make. Despite the truth of existence lying in subjectivity, there is a paradox shown here; that humans are almost preset to reach for objectivity despite the ‘answer’ existing in the other direction: beyond subjectivity.