Thesis Paper代写:管理公司

2017-02-18 00:40

法律上，董事会被定义为“管理公司”，有权履行公司的所有权利和义务的公司，除了那些在股东大会的职权范围内。董事会还开展战略发展，管理资金，决定公司的生存。因此，董事长的重要美德和必要性是公平、透明和全责。基于以上原因，董事会成员的选择是一项极其重要的行为，必须对各种客观因素进行识别和评估，并贯穿于各个方面。财务汇报局表示：“对候选人的搜索应该进行了择优任命，对客观标准和对多样性的董事会，利益考虑包括性别。”（财务报告委员会（FRC），2010：13）。我们可以看到在上述任命。没有重要的素质作为招聘候选人的基础。而股东必须在任命中出现，以确保透明度和公开性，在评估候选人的实际能力，因为所有的事情都有利于为股东带来最大的利润。显然，我们无法找到公平和透明的选择。此外，缺乏公正是一个积极的事情表示任命。据奥尼尔和托马斯（1996）：“任命过程中可能会倾向于选择狭隘的候选人根据董事会成员的个人，社会，专业和商业网络的偏好”。在选举中，偏见不再是陌生人，当候选人的选择是根据每个人倾向于评估板，从而导致候选人之间的不平等和难以作出准确的判断每个人的能力。在选举选举委员会成员时，一切都必须在总统的监督下进行。然而，在上述选举中，没有设立民意委员会，以评估候选人，董事会是独自评估。它显示出缺乏认真性和缺乏专业，以及影响候选人的机会。这表明，权力的不平等分配成员之间。总之，这个任命不符合公平、透明和问责三项基本美德。这会对董事会的错误决策产生重大影响，同时也会对候选人的真实能力缺乏全面的认识。

Thesis Paper代写:管理公司

Legally, Board of Directors are defined as "the management company", has the right to perform the company on behalf of all the rights and obligations of the company, except for those within the authority of the General Assembly shareholders. The Board of Directors also launch the strategic development, manages funds and decides the survival of the company. Therefore, important virtues and necessity of the board chairman are fairness, transparency and full responsibility.

For the reasons mentioned above, the selection of board members is an extremely important act, must be identified and assessed on various objective factors, spread over every aspect. The Financial Reporting Council stated that: “The search for candidates should be conducted and appointments made on merit, against objective criteria and with due regard for the benefits of diversity on the board, including gender.” (Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2010: 13). We can see in the above appointment. No important qualities are used as the basis for recruitment of candidates. And the shareholders must appear in the appointment to ensure transparency and openness in the assessment of the actual abilities of the candidates because all things are in favour of bring the most profit for shareholders. Obviously, we cannot find the fairness and transparency in the selection.

In addition to that, lack of impartiality is one positive thing expressed on the appointment. According to O’Neal and Thomas (1996): “ the appointment process may have the tendency in choosing the narrow pool of candidates according to the preference of the members of Board of directors personal, social, professional and business networks”. The prejudice is no longer a stranger in the election, when the selection of candidates was carried out based on the tendency of each individual preferred in evaluation board, which leads to unequal between candidates and difficult to make accurate judgments about the capacity of each person. When organizing an election board member, everything must take place under the supervision of the president. However, in an election above, there is no public election commission was formed to evaluate the candidates that the Board was self assessment alone. It shows a lack of seriousness and lack of professional as well as affecting the chances of the candidates. That showed that power was not equitably distributed among members.

In conclusion, this appointment did not satisfy three essential virtues as fairness, transparency and accountability. That causes significant impact to the erroneous decision of the board chairman as well as offering a comprehensive insight lack of genuine capacity of the candidates.