澳洲阿德莱德代写作业:生理过程来解释

2018-12-05 16:21

经评估，证据似乎表明，通常在灵魂中发现的那些特征，同样可以用生理过程来解释。这并不是说二元论没有试图逃避困境。事实上，已经设计了两种模式。那些支持前者的人已经假定死亡时尸体会立即被替换。对佛教徒来说，身体是物质的，对基督徒来说;精神上的。虽然转世通常缺乏对前世存在的任何认识，而且普遍承认存在于不同时空平面上的空灵体，但验证仍然困难。第二种模式的支持者认为，灵魂可能以一种非常有限的能力脱离肉体而存在。对于天主教徒来说，这可能是暂时的(炼狱)，直到与一个身体(祝福的景象)结合，或者是永久的(地狱)。但是赖尔和他的鬼魂呢?形势必须重新调整。很明显，在试图使灵魂理论合理化的过程中，人总是要回到出发点;虽然不能完全否定这一概念，但从生理学上看，它似乎不太可能。然而，赖尔的陈述不仅仅是一个假设;这是一个明确的声明。因此，虽然经验证据似乎倾向于唯物主义，虽然二元论作为一种合理的可能性继续存在，赖尔的论点将仍然没有得到证实。
澳洲阿德莱德代写作业:生理过程来解释
On evaluation, evidence would appear to suggest that those features generally identified within a soul, could equally be explainable in terms of physiological processes. That is not to say the Dualist has not attempted to evade the predicament. In fact, two schemas have been devised. Those subscribing to the first have postulated the immediate replacement of the body at death. For Buddhists the body is physical, for Christians; spiritual. Although, with the reincarnate generally lacking any awareness of a previous existence and ethereal bodies widely acknowledged to exist on a different spatiotemporal plane, verification remains difficult. Advocates of the second schema have suggested that the soul could exist disembodied, in a very limited capacity. For Catholics this may be temporally (Purgatory) until united with a body (Beatific Vision), or permanently (Hell).But what of Ryle and his ghost? The situation must be readdressed. It is clear that in attempting to rationalize the theory of the soul, one invariably returns to the starting point; that, whilst the notion cannot be dismissed entirely, it does appear physiologically unlikely. Ryle’s statement, however, was more than just a hypothesis; it was a definitive claim. Thus, though empirical evidence seems to lean in favour of the Materialist, whilst Dualism continues as a legitimate possibility, Ryle’s contention will remain unsubstantiated.

• 上一篇：澳洲阿德莱德代写作业:中世纪思想时期
• 下一篇：阿德莱德Adelaide代写Essay:大量信息