阿德莱德作业代写 公共卫生

2020-05-13 14:05

这项研究是为了满足加州州立大学富勒顿卫生科学系公共卫生硕士(MPH)研究生学位的部分要求而进行的。系统的回顾有助于从以前的研究中学习，加强今后的研究。系统回顾有助于限制偏倚，增加可靠性，减少发现实施过程中的延迟，提高普遍性，开展更多关于研究人群亚群的研究，并增加结果的有效性。作为结果地图，揭示心理健康服务子群体有效性的证据，并提供进一步的建议，这些建议是基于提供给亚裔美国人(AA)和夏威夷土著太平洋岛民(NHPI)的原始研究，这些人向任何个人披露自己有精神疾病。与这一系统综述相关的一个问题是，我们对披露不同AA和NHPI亚组的精神疾病了解多少。作者将筛选标题、摘要和参考文献列表，以便潜在的包含。至少15种出版物被选中进行全文审查以评估入选资格。数据提取的标准化表格将被创建，以捕捉抑郁和焦虑的基本研究特征，包括相关研究目标、参与者、地理位置、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民亚组，以及研究设计和分析。数据通过地理位置、研究方法、AA和NHPI组进行分类综合。目前还没有可用于系统审查的报告规程。本系统审查将遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目的指导方针，以帮助该方法的结构。
阿德莱德作业代写 公共卫生
This review is being conducted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Masters of Public Health (MPH) graduate degree at the CSU Fullerton Department of Health Science. A systematic review is helpful in enhance future studies by learning from previous studies. Systematic reviews are beneficial in limiting bias, increasing reliability, reducing delay during the implementation of discoveries, improving generalizability, initiating more research about subgroups of the study population, and increase the validity of the results . Serving as a map of results to expose evidence on the effectiveness of mental health services subgroups as well as provide further recommendations based on original studies offered to Asian American (AA) and Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander (NHPI) who disclose having a mental illness to any individual. A relevant question associated with this systematic review is what do we know about disclosure of a mental illness in different AA and NHPI subgroups.The author will screen titles, abstracts and references list for potential inclusion. A minimum of fifteen publications is selected for full-text review for inclusion eligibility assessment. A standardized form for data extraction will be created to capture essential study characteristic by depression and anxiety, and include relevant research objective, participants, geographical location, Asian American and Pacific Islander subgroups, and study design and analysis. Data is synthesized by categorizing geographic location, study methodology, and AA and NHPI groups. There is currently no reporting protocols available for this systematic review. This systematic review will follow the guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to aid in the structure of this approach.

• 上一篇：澳洲Adelaide作业代写 麦当劳
• 下一篇：阿德莱德作业代写 资源基础理论