布里斯班Essay代写:米切尔和帕尔默

2017-04-10 01:48

米切尔和帕尔默（2005）比较了匹配对照组对31名少年罪犯的影响。没有发现有显著的治疗效果被证明是重新犯罪率。正如威尔金森（2005）指出的那样，对这些最新研究的批评，如米切尔和帕尔默（2005），是他们的小样本量。falshaw，友谊，Travers &纽金特（2004），但在一个更大的研究检查了649名犯人收到R & R训练与对照组的1947名囚犯。再次，没有显着差异，两组在重新犯罪率比较。许多不同的操作进行了这项研究的作者试图找到这两个条件之间的差异。例如，与监狱的标准治疗相比，R训练，一年的定罪率进行了检查，以及两年利率。所有这些显示组间没有显著差异，而在一个比较，在高危罪犯的重新犯罪大鼠实际上是更高的R & R组。当然不是令人鼓舞的结果。除了从更广义的方法来改造犯人，也有犯人需要特别在意他们的康复是任何有效的特定类型。其中一个最大的群体包括那些有某种心理健康问题的囚犯。主持人（2003）发现，许多囚犯康复不能广义计划利用那些遭受许多心理健康问题。囚犯，例如，学习困难，人格障碍或其他社会和认知问题，会发现很难受益于需要团体互动和其他类型的小组工作的干预措施。
布里斯班Essay代写:米切尔和帕尔默
Mitchell & Palmer (2005) compared the effects of R&R on 31 juvenile offenders with a matched control group. The effect of the treatment as evidenced by reconviction rates was found not to be significant. As Wilkinson (2005) points out, a criticism of many of these more recent studies, like Mitchell & Palmer (2005), is their small sample size. Falshaw, Friendship, Travers & Nugent (2004), though, in a larger study examined 649 prisoners who had received the R&R training with a matched control group of 1,947 prisoners. Again, no significant difference was found between the two groups when reconviction rates were compared. A number of different manipulations were carried out by this study's authors to try and find a difference between the two conditions. For example the R&R training was compared with the prison's standard treatment, the one-year conviction rates were examined as well as the two-year rates. All of these revealed no significant differences between the groups, while in one comparison, in high-risk offenders, the reconviction rats were actually higher for the R&R group. Certainly not encouraging findings.Apart from the more generalised approaches to rehabilitating prisoners, there are also certain types of prisoners who require specific care if their rehabilitation is to be considered in any way effective. One of the largest groups comprises those prisoners who have some kind of mental health problem. O’Grady (2003) has identified that many of the generalised programmes of prisoner rehabilitation cannot be taken advantage of by those suffering from many mental health problems. Prisoners with, for example, learning difficulties, personality disorders or other social and cognitive problems will find it difficult to benefit from interventions that require group interactions and other types of group work.