- Accounting essay 代写
- America Essay 代写
- Anthropology essay 代写
- Architecture Essay代写
- Arts essay 代写
- Biology Essay 代写
- Business Essay 代写
- Chemistry essay代写
- Commerce Essay 代写
- Economics Assignment 代写
- Communications Essay 代写
- Computer Science Essay 代写
- Construction Essay 代写
- Criminology Essay 代写
- Cultural Studies Essay 代写
- Economics Essay 代写
- Education Essay 代写
- Engineering Essay 代写
- English Literature Essay 代写
- Environmental Sciences 代写
- Film Studies Essay 代写
- Finance Essay 代写
- General Studies Essay 代写
- Health Essay 代写
- History Essay 代写
- Human Resource Essay 代写
- Information Technology 代写
- It Research Essay 代写
- Law Essay 代写
- Management Essay 代写
- Marketing Essay 代写
- Media Essay 代写
- Nursing Essay 代写
- Philosophy Essay 代写
- Physical Education Essay 代写
- Make My Essay
- Politics Essay代写
- Psychology Essay 代写
- Religion Essay 代写
- Sciences Essay 代写
- Social Work Essay 代写
- Sociology Essay 代写
- Theology Essay 代写
- Tourism Essay 代写
- Weekly Studies 代写
- Dissertation 代写
- Coursework 代写
- APA Essay 代写
- MHRA essay 代写
- MBA Essay 代写
- Homework 代写
- Research Paper 代写
- 国立大学代写Essay
- 昆士兰代写ESSAY
- 墨尔本Melbourne代写Essay
- Monash 莫纳什 essay 代写
- Sydney悉尼代写essay
- 阿德莱德Adelaide代写Essay
- Brisbane布里斯班代写Essay
- 西澳代写essay
- Macquarie麦考瑞代写essay
- Deakin 迪肯代写Essay
- 南澳代写essay
- 纽卡斯尔代写Essay
- 塔斯马尼亚代写Essay
- Wollongong 卧龙岗代写Essay
- Griffith格里菲斯代写Essay
- LaTrobe拉筹伯代写Essay
- HR Essay 代写
- Perth珀斯代写Essay
- 詹姆斯库克代写essay
- Murdoch莫道克代写Essay
- 埃迪斯科文代写Essay
- Wollongong卧龙岗代写assignment
- Charles查尔斯特代写Essay
- MYOB paper 代写
- 维多利亚代写Essay
- 斯文本代写essay
- SPSS paper 代写
- 堪培拉代写Essay
- 英国代写essay
- 邦德代写Essay
- 南十字星代写essay
- 阳光海安代写Essay
- 查尔斯达尔文代写Essay
- Wellington 惠灵顿 Essay 代写
- Massey 梅西大学代写Essay
- Thesis Paper 代写
- Auckland奥克兰代写Essay
- Otago奥塔哥代写essay
詹姆斯库克代写essay:民主政权
2017-03-09 14:07

詹姆斯库克代写essay:民主政权
Regardless as to how the establishing of a democratic regime comes about, its consolidation can be the most difficult part of the process, particularly if elites from the old regime look to undermine a new democratic government. The new democracy that emerged in Venezuela in the late 1950s is a case in point, with Karl writing: “although long-term structural changes had strengthened emerging social forces at the expense of traditional interests, the ability of new actors to define a different order was always constrained by the persistent power, or the appearance of power of “nostalgic” elites who sought to limit reform” (p210 O’Donnell et al 1986). The transition in Venezuela had initially seen some consensus between elites as trade unions, factory owners and the new government compromised to produce an Emergency Plan to get the economy up and running after that overthrow of Perez Jimenez. The fear of the US looking to protect its oil investments was a problem in Venezuela, particularly in the light of its involvement in the overthrow of the reformist Arbenz government in Guatemala. However it was a group of right wing army officers that refused to accept the legitimacy of the new government that posed the greatest threat to the democratic transition, with an attempted coup being the most dramatic of their attempts to undermine the power of the Accion Democratica (AD) led government. In fact, in Venezuela, it was a consensus of groups – the oil companies, the Church, the US and the military – joined together to protect traditional elite interests that greatly affected policy making in Venezuela in the early years of its democracy. The new government had to compromise with the powerful elites from the former regime. Karl describes the process as such: “in order to accommodate the demands and desires of new politically organised actors without significantly threatening the interests of those who were strong enough to reverse the process of change, democratisation required an explicit definition of the new parameters of action and rules of the game, both formal and informal which could guarantee the basic objectives of all actors” (p212 O’Donnell et al 1986). The result of such negotiation were the establishment of a number of interlocking elite-negotiated pacts in 1958 that remained in place during the early years of the Batancourt administration and bound all signatories to the same basic political and economic programme, regardless of electoral outcomes. True democrats may have been critical of the pacts as they did take away some of the freedoms of an elected administration to set its own course, yet such compromise between political elites were necessary in Venezuela to lessen the possibility of a swift return to authoritarian or military rule.
作业和论文马上就deadline了!千万不要随便找论文代写服务,一定要找一家靠得住的诚信机构!你完全可以将你的重托交给我们!我们非常专业,100%守时!
COPYRIGHT © 2016 EssayMost ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. OUR SERVICE PROVIDED WILL BE USED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESEARCH.网站统计