ASSIGNMENT代写

澳洲莫纳什essay代写 资本方法

2020-02-24 19:29

在这篇文章中,作者重新修订了布迪厄的“资本方法”,以探索性别不平等与性别职业分割之间更深层次的关系(布迪厄1986)。作者发现,女性和男性似乎都可能从事“自娱自娱”的职业(Preston & Whitehouse 2004:8)。例如,2010年,卫生保健、社会和社区服务行业79%的员工是女性,建筑领域88%的员工是男性(澳大利亚政府2011年)。这篇文章的重点是讨论“性别资本”的概念如何影响澳大利亚劳动力进入职业隔离。它是基于作者之前的工作,也使用布尔迪厄(Huppatz 2009;2012)。作者认为,性别资本的概念有助于通过职业隔离扩大妇女和男子的运动。布迪厄的概念阐述了三种类型的资本:1)社会资本;2)经济资本和3)文化资本。作者扩展了布迪厄的概念,以了解性别实践如何导致职业隔离。他们指出,“性别资本”可以解释性别和阶级过程。因此,他们将这种返工作为一种理论和经验目的(Huppatz 2012)。他们证明,男性和女性的概念是一种资源,解释了劳动力运动中各种各样的成功。Huppatz(2009)认为女性不应该被认定为女性状态,男性不应该被认定为男性状态。这意味着我们需要“以不同的方式对待性别”
澳洲莫纳什essay代写 资本方法
In this article, the authors reworked Bourdieu’s “ capital approach” to explore a deeper insight between gender inequality and sex occupational segmentation (Bourdieu 1986). The authors found that both women and men seems likely to work in “own-sex” occupations (Preston & Whitehouse 2004:8). For example, 79% of the employees in health care, social  and community service industry were women and 88% of the employees in the construction area were men in 2010 (Australia Government 2011). This article focuses on discussing how the concept of ‘gender capital’ influences the Australian workforce into occupational segregation. It is based on the author’s previous work also using Bourdieu (Huppatz 2009;2012). The authors believe that the concept of gender capital is useful for expanding women’s and men’s movement through occupational segregation. Bourdieu’s concept stated to three types of capital: 1)social capital; 2) economic capital and 3) cultural capital. The authors expand Bourdieu’s concept to know how gender practice results in occupational segregation. They state that ‘gender capital’ could explain for both gender and class processes. Thus they serve this reworking as a theoretical and empirical purpose (Huppatz 2012). They demonstrate that concepts of both masculinity and femininity are a resource that explains the variety of success in the movement in the labour force. Huppatz (2009) argued that feminine should not be identified as female condition and masculine should not be recognised as a male condition. This means that we need to ‘do gender differently’.