奥塔哥代写essay:男人和女人是互补

2019-01-27 23:59

卢梭强调男女角色的根本不同，他认为男人和女人是互补的，女人的角色是培养和必要的，如果男人能自由地承担公共角色，战士和政治家。在《爱弥儿》中，索菲是他的性身份。卢梭认为男人与女人的结合是对他本性的贬低。卢梭对婚姻的看法显然在很多方面都很传统，但他没有传统地为这种安排辩护。卢梭的《爱弥尔》使妻子负责让这个男人呆在家里和她保持在他的自由,但同时使用所有的女性魅力和聪明的欺骗,以确保他想呆在他,仍然自由但也充实他的父母的责任。卢梭认为妻子的工作,简单地说,就是欺骗人到呆在家里为他保持他的自由的假象,通过服务需要这样的心理状态,这一点是如果索菲•伍讨论复杂作用这样的智能理解妻子,她必须知道男性特征和性质,心理学的男性来对付他们。卢梭预见到了这一立场并对此进行了反驳，他认为，如果女性试图通过以男性美德来定义自己来与男性竞争，那么她们将会形成一种社会状态，在这种状态下，她们甚至比男性的奴仆还要多。卢梭认为，男人比女人更善于成为男人。卢梭解释说，苏菲的教育需要有所不同，因为她是未来的母亲，而女性生来就是为做母亲而设计的。在强调母亲身份的重要性的同时，他也提到了女性作为母亲的角色。在《爱弥儿》第一卷中对母亲们的讲话中，他承认她们在青年教育中处于首要地位。通过否定女性的推理能力，他否定了女性抚养孩子的能力，玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特(Mary Wollstonecraft)后来试图证明这一点。
奥塔哥代写essay:男人和女人是互补
Rousseau emphasized the fundamentally different roles of men and women, he considers men and women complimentary to each other , women roles is to nurture and essential if men free to take on public roles and warrior and politicians. In Emile,Sophie is his sexual identity. Rousseau considers a man’s union with a woman a debasement of his nature. Rousseau has a view of marriage apparently quite traditional in many respects, but he does not defend that arrangement traditionally. Rousseau’s Emile makes the wife responsible for keeping the man at home and she is to maintain in him a sense of his freedom and yet at the same time use all sort of feminine charms and intelligent deceptions to make sure that he wants to stay at him, still free but also fulfilling his parental duty. Rousseau considers wife’s job, simply put, is to deceive the man into staying at home by sustaining for him the illusion of his freedom, by serving his need for such a psychological state, that point is discussed by Wollstonecraft that if Sophie has to play complicated role of such a smart understanding wife, she has to know the men traits and nature, psychology of men to deal with them. Rousseau anticipates this stance and argues against it, making the case that if women seek to compete with men by defining themselves in terms of male virtues, then they will foster a state of society in which they are even more than before the servants of men. Men are better at being men than women are, Rousseau claims. Rousseau explains that Sophie’s education needs to be different because she is to be future mother, and women are designed by nature for motherhood. While insisting on the importance of motherhood, he stumbles on women’s role as mothers. In addressing mothers in Book I of Emile, he acknowledges their primacy in the education of youth. By denying women the ability to reason he denies them the ability to raise children, which Mary Wollstonecraft later attempts to prove.