珀斯代写Essay:霍克斯

2017-05-08 00:43

霍克斯比2004讨论特许学校是一种学校的选择，越来越多的人觉得有趣。这是因为特许学校可以为普通公立学校提供正面竞争。他们也可能是创新者，在学校管理，课程和技术的使用。他们可以为那些被限制在失败学校的孩子提供替代品。一个有效的，安全的替代学校可能是特别重要的家庭谁是弱势群体，因为他们往往缺乏办法逃脱失败的学校搬到另一个地区。特许学校是公立学校，因此接受所有的学生平等。此外，特许学校参与他们的国家问责制和遵守许多州和联邦法规。特许学校和普通公立学校的本质区别是，特许学校以每个学生的费用存在。如果他们能吸引学生，他们可以成长，但是，如果他们不能吸引学生，他们将不可避免地关闭。总之，特许学校将元素的普通公立学校和私立学校，因此感兴趣的人想在美国的教育改革看谁担心教育自由放任的市场。berends，et al，2006回顾，我们在学校对学生成绩的影响，在那里我们可以更好的去描述了解特许学校的影响在不同的研究。首先，我们回顾特许学校对学生成绩的研究和评估特许学校研究的评论。第二，我们认为，研究是在一个点上，我们可以开始勾勒出一个更系统，严谨的特许学校研究的荟萃分析，更清楚地了解他们对学生成绩的影响。第三，我们认为与人相处，我们需要开放特许学校的黑盒子，包括教学和组织，促进成果以及拆包机和普通公立学校和教室中的课程与教学的差异条件下采集的数据。
珀斯代写Essay:霍克斯
Hoxby 2004 discuss charter schools are a form of school choice that a growing number of people find interesting. This is because charter schools may provide positive competition for regular public schools. They may also be innovators in school management, curriculum, and the use of technology. They may provide alternatives for children who would otherwise be confined to failing schools. An effective, safe alternative school may be especially important for families who are disadvantaged because they often lack the means to escape a failing school by moving to another area. Charter schools are public schools and thus accept all students equally. Also, charter schools participate in their states' accountability systems and obey many state and federal regulations. The essential difference between charter schools and regular public schools is that charter schools exist on a fee-per-student basis. If they can attract students, they can grow.However, if they fail to attract students, they will inevitably close. In short, charter schools combine elements of regular public schools and private schools and therefore interest people who want to see reform in American education but who worry about a laissez-faire market for education.Berends, et al, 2006 review where we are in terms of charter school effects on student achievement and describe where we might go to better understand charter school effects across various studies. First, we review charter school research on student achievement and assess the reviews of charter school studies. Second, we argue that research is at a point where we can begin to outline a more systematic, rigorous meta-analysis of charter school studies for a clearer understanding of their effects on student achievement. Third, we argue along with others that we need to open up the black box of charter schools, including gathering data on instructional and organizational conditions that promote achievement as well as unpacking the curricular and instructional differences among charter and regular public schools and classrooms.