国立大学代写Assignment:可信计算

2017-03-24 11:15

可信计算最重要的领域是对电子数据的保护，特别是在身份欺诈和盗窃的时代。因此，需要有严格的法律制度，以保护个人免受此类事件。本章将讨论法律保护的必要性，特别是当个人的生命可以通过软件程序和网络。本片将集中在英国的数据保护制度为例，参照欧盟和欧洲人权公约。因此，有必要，当信息泄露通过病毒，软件公司根据数据保护条款承担责任，因为这是一个严格保护区的重大制裁。因此，本次讨论将讨论这些保护作为一种方法来制裁软件公司，如果有软件是不可靠的，违反是一个软件公司的病毒的直接原因。隐私和保护数据的概念已经演变的文件来源，排除了20世纪80年代中后期以来，自家庭电脑成为标准的家庭大众。自那时以来，电子数据的概念迅速发展到网络空间的幽灵区和紧凑的存储组件，从存储器存储键到可拆卸的蓝牙设备。这些设备不只是；使媒体带来重要消息，尽快使企业更高效和移动；但也使它更容易下载的机密或私人信息泄露给媒体的无节制和窃取商业机密。因此，新的高科技媒体的电子数据，使进一步复杂的情况下，信息的自由和隐私的概念。互联网是最引人注目的例子，因为它不存在实时，而是一个组合的骨干电脑，通过网络空间，因此个人可以连接到世界各地的网站。因此，与卫星通信，有线通信，无线电通信和电话通信不一定是一个始发国。取而代之的是一个新的沟通维度，一个被称为赛博空间的幽灵维度。因此，调节这个地区很难构思和执行；问题的范围从版权违反通过违反信心，诽谤、隐私权与刑事犯罪的入侵，如儿童色情和煽动仇恨。也有网站展示了如何杀死，制造炸弹和显示一个如何促进犯罪，因此使互联网成为宝贵的资产，沟通，教育和知识，但也非常危险，因为它是很难调节。每个国家都试图建立法规却重新活跃起来，而不是主动的因为它是唯一可能关闭该网站的网站的创始人皮条客除非可以确定，在国家或国家党在调节给定类型的网站，一个会议。然而，每个国家都有不同的解释，不同的法律，比如周边下载的版权法，在美国它是上传或下载文件，违反版权法的行为；而在加拿大，它是一种犯罪行为上传不违反版权法律文件下载。因此，互联网引起了无数的问题，因为加拿大法律不起诉那些谁在美国的网站下载的下载，但起诉那些上传网站在加拿大，这似乎是非常片面的。这是因为美国的民众进行上传和下载文件的版权违法网站，这意味着这些市民可从网站下载在加拿大；因此保护加拿大和美国的利益。因此，这是一个问题，保护电子数据，但也有其他问题，互联网围绕个人的隐私和信息的自由和新闻自由。这个问题在互联网上的个人信息监管；而如果一篇文章被刊登在报纸上，可能构成违反信任或诽谤很容易提出一个案例因为被告是很容易确定一个国家和一个特定的法律制度。另一方面，如果一篇文章发表在互联网上，这是非常难以规范，除非在一个既定的网站，如绿色和平组织或时报。

国立大学代写Assignment:可信计算

The most important area of trustworthy computing is the protection of electronic data, especially in an era of identity fraud and theft. Therefore there needs to be strict legal regimes to protect the individual from such occurrences. This piece will discuss the need for legal protections, especially when an individual’s life can be mapped through software programmes and networks. This piece will focus on the case study of the UK’s data protection regime, with reference to the EU and the ECHR. Therefore it is necessary that when the information is leaked through viruses that the software companies are liable under the data protection provisions, as this is a strictly protected area with major sanctions. Therefore this discussion will discuss these protections as a way to sanction software companies if there software is not reliable and a breach is a direct cause of a software company’s virus.
The notion of privacy and the protection of data have evolved from the paper sources that precluded the mid-late 1980s, ever since the home computer became standard in the homes of mass public. Since this time the concept of electronic data has rapidly evolved to the phantom areas of cyberspace and the compact storage components from memory storage keys to detachable Bluetooth devices. These devices do not only; enable the media to bring important news as soon as possible and make businesses more efficient and mobile; but also makes it a lot easier to download confidential or private information to divulge to the press unconscionably and to steal trade secrets. Therefore the new high tech media of electronic data has enabled further complications in the situation concerning the freedom of/to information and the concept of privacy. The internet is the most compelling example because it does not exist in real-time, but is a combination of backbone computers which link through cyberspace, hence an individual can connect to websites all over the world. Therefore unlike satellite communications, cable communications, radio communications and telephone communications there is not necessarily an originating state. Instead there is a new dimension of communication, a phantom dimension known as cyberspace. Hence making the regulation of this area very difficult to conceptualise and enforce; the problems range from copyright breaches through to breaches of confidence, slander, invasion of privacy and criminal offences, such as child pornography and incitement to hatred. There are also websites that show one how to kill, make bombs and show one how to facilitate a crime, hence making the Internet an invaluable asset for communication, education and knowledge but also very dangerous because it is very hard to regulate. Each state has attempted to set up regulations but they are very re-active, as opposed to pro-active because it is only possible to shut down the procurers of the Internet sites unless the originator of the websites can be determined and are in the state or a state party to a convention in regulating the given type of sites. However each state has a varying interpretation of different laws, one example is the copyright laws surrounding downloads, in the USA it is an offence to upload or download files which contravene copyright laws; whereas in Canada it is an offence to upload but not download files which contravene copyright laws. Therefore the Internet cause a myriad of problems because the Canadian law does not prosecute those who procure downloads from sites based in the USA, but does prosecute those who upload sites in Canada, which seems very one-sided. This is because the USA prosecutes those citizens who upload and download files from sites in contravention of copyright laws, which means these citizens may be downloading from sites in Canada; hence protecting the Canadian as well the USA’s interests. Therefore this is one problem with protecting electronic data; however there are other problems with the Internet which surrounds the individual’s privacy and the freedom of information and the freedom of the press. The problems surround the regulation of personal information on the Internet; whereas if an article was published in a newspaper which could possibly constitute as a breach of confidence or libel it is easy to present a case because the defendant is easily identified to a state and a particular legal system. On the other hand, if an article is published on the Internet it is a lot harder to regulate unless on an established site, such as Greenpeace or The Times.