澳洲莫道克代写Essay:埃利斯顿和庞佐的理论

2019-01-02 00:32

这篇文章将从埃利斯顿和庞佐的理论中讨论滥交和婚前性行为的话题。根据Punzo关于婚前性行为的观点，两个人在没有完全承诺的情况下进行了性接触/性交，但另一方面，根据Elliston的观点，滥交是在没有任何承诺的情况下与许多不同的人发生性行为。当比较两者时，Punzo被认为是保守的，而Elliston被认为是支持随随性行为的。Punzo的理论是，当两个人在一起做爱时，他们都必须在两个人之间投入很深的感情。另一方面，埃利斯顿认为，性交不需要任何想法或任何承诺的强烈考虑，因为这不是什么大事。根据埃利斯顿的观点，滥交是一种自由的爱，你可以在那里遇到一个人，然后开始爱上他们。有了这个定义，一些人可能更容易理解它，就像拥有自由一样。它也可以被认为是娱乐性的性爱，仅仅是为了好玩而做爱。当“乐趣”这个词出现在任何事物中时，人们会觉得它很吸引人，很容易相处。埃利斯顿自己给滥交下了一个更好的定义。“滥交被定义为与一系列其他没有直接通过婚姻关系和没有承诺的成年人发生性关系;没有爱情的承诺，未来的性排他性。
澳洲莫道克代写Essay:埃利斯顿和庞佐的理论
This essay will be discussing the topic of promiscuity and premarital sex from both Elliston’s and Punzo’s theories. According to Punzo on Premarital sex, it is for two people to have engaged in a sexual contact/intercourse without having the full commitment but on the other hand, promiscuity according to Elliston it is to have sex with many different people without having any commitment. When comparing both, Punzo is seen as the conservative while Elliston is seen as supporting casual sex. Punzo’s theory is when two people are together having sex they both must be engaged in a deep commitment between the two people. On the other hand, Elliston is arguing that sexual intercourse doesn’t require any thoughts or strong consideration with any commitments since it is not that big of a deal. According to Elliston promiscuity is seen as free love, where you can just meet someone and starting to fall in love with them. With this definition, it might be easier for some to understand it, as having freedom. It can also be recognized as having recreational sex, having sex just for fun. When the word fun comes with anything, it will be seen as attractive and easy going. Elliston has created a definition himself that better defined promiscuity. “Promiscuity is defined as sex with a series of other adults not directly related through marriage and with no commitments; no promises of affection, sexual exclusivity in future.

• 上一篇：澳洲莫道克代写Essay:社会契约论
• 下一篇：澳洲莫道克代写Essay:最初的悔恨