ASSIGNMENT代写

澳洲哲学assignment代写 恶意或敌意

2020-03-28 00:02

一个普通人,只是为了完成他的工作,没有任何个人的恶意或敌意,实际上可以成为一个可怕的破坏过程的工具。此外,当他们的工作使破坏过程变得明显,当他们被要求执行的任务不符合他们自己的道德价值观时,大多数人无法抗拒领导者的命令。在第一个实验的基础上,Milgram进一步讨论了什么因素与服从行为的产生有关。他从服从的主观维度和客观维度探讨了实验条件的操作。米尔格拉姆手术的客观条件有很多。首先是“教师”与“学生”之间的距离:教师与学生之间的距离分为四个年级,每个年级有40名参与者。分析数据后发现,“学生”越接近“教师”,参与者越不服从,距离越远,参与者越容易服从。其次是实验者与被试之间的关系。这种关系被分为三种情况:实验者和参与者面对面;实验者解释完任务后离开,并通过电话与参与者保持联系;实验人员不在场,所有的指令都由录音机播放。结果显示,在第一种情况下,参与者的服从程度是其他情况下的三倍。第三,是实验者的地位。结果表明,实验人员的地位越高,接受最强电击测试的“学生”人数越多。
澳洲哲学assignment代写 恶意或敌意
An ordinary person, just to get his work done, without any personal malice or enmity, can actually be a tool for a horrific process of destruction. Moreover, when their work makes the destruction process obvious, when the tasks they are asked to perform do not conform to their own moral values, most people are unable to resist the orders of leaders.On the basis of the first experiment, Milgram further discusses what factors are involved in the generation of obedience behavior. He explored the manipulation of experimental conditions from the subjective and objective dimensions of obedience. The objective conditions of Milgram’s operation include many.Firstly, it is the distance between “teacher” and “student”: The distance between teachers and students is divided into four grades, with 40 participants participating in each grade. After analysing the data, the result shows that the closer the “student” is to “teacher”, the more the participant refuses to obey, and the farther the distance is, the easier the participant is to obey. Secondly, it is the relationship between the experimenter and the participant. The relationship was divided into three situations: the experimenter and the participant were face to face together; the experimenter left after explaining the task and kept in touch with the participant by telephone; the experimenter was not present, and all instructions were played by a tape recorder. The results showed that in the first case, the participants obeyed three times more than in the other cases. Thirdly, it is the status of the experimenter. The results showed that the higher the status of the experimenters, the higher the number of the “students” who were tested with the strongest electric shock.