西澳代写essay:纯粹理性批判

2018-12-18 17:02

虽然康德在《纯粹理性批判》中试图将形而上学从像休谟这样的怀疑论者的破坏性力量中拯救出来，但他并没有找到上帝存在的充分证据;相反，通过他的科学探究，他确立了人类理性在寻求向本体扩展其边界的现象中的适当作用。东西存在于本体中包含的是完美的想法和概念理解的形式,使人类认识到诸如从内部责任的概念,但上帝和人类所捏造的描述第一个原因是不自然的本体。因此，上帝的存在本身并不是以他是上帝为基础的，而是以最完美的概念和观念为基础的。康德认为，上帝的存在不能用这种内省的方式来证明。许多有基督教信仰的信徒和执事相信，人认识神，虽然在有限的意义上，是通过他们参与永恒的律法，也就是印在他们心里的自然法或良心。通过这种参与，一个人开始了解道德律法，并把严格遵守这些律法视为值得天赐的补偿。这种信念也遵循因果原则，但对康德来说，这是不够的，一个完美的无条件对一个条件的偶然性也是不够的.
西澳代写essay:纯粹理性批判
Although Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason attempts to save metaphysics from the destructive powers of skeptics like David Hume, he does not find sufficient proof for the existence of God; rather through his scientific inquiry, he establishes the proper role of human reason in the phenomena which seeks to extend its boundaries towards the noumena. Things that exist in the noumena are perfect ideas and concepts which are contained in the forms of understanding so that a human being recognizes the concept of things such as duty from within, but God himself and what human beings has fabricated to describe the First Cause is not natural to the noumena. Therefore the existence of God per se is not so much grounded in that he is God but rather in the most perfect concepts and ideas.The existence of God cannot be proven in that manner of introspection according to Kant. Many believers and magistrates in the Christian faith believe that human beings come to know about God, although in a limited sense, through their participation in the eternal laws, which is called the natural law or conscience which is imprinted in them. Through this participation one comes to know about the moral laws and attributes the strict adherence to such laws being worthy of heavenly compensation. This belief also follows the principle of cause and effect but to Kant this is not sufficient and the contingence of a perfect unconditional on a conditional